|
n Information for professionals and suppliers |
|
|
What is the difference between QRisk and the traditional Framingham score? |
The QRisk CVD score contains many of the traditional risk factors included in Framingham (such as age, sex, cholesterol/HDL ratio blood pressure and smoking status) but also contains important additional risk factors:
n Family History of premature coronary heart disease in a first degree relative under the age of 60
n Deprivation (measured using the Townsend deprivation score)
n Blood Pressure Treatment
n Body Mass Index |
|
|
Why was a new CVD risk score needed for the UK when we already have Framingham? |
n Estimates of CVD risk derived from equations are not an exact science but are better than clinical judgment alone for the estimation of CVD risk.
n A number of risk assessment equations are available that estimate cardiovascular risk in individual patients. They have been derived from studies of individuals who have been followed up often for substantial lengths of time.
n Risk assessment equations predict risk best in the type of population from which they were derived. The Framingham equations were derived from North American populations from the 1960s to the 1980s when coronary heart disease (CHD) was at its peak and they overestimate risk in contemporary European populations by around 100% in Southern European populations and by 50% or more in Northern European populations including the UK.
n Conversely, such equations may underestimate risk in populations such as people with diabetes, South Asian men or the most socially deprived who are at higher than average risk. Overall the Framingham risk equation is likely to overestimate risk in the current UK population.
n They may also underestimate risk in people with extreme risk factor levels or other clinical risks not included in the model. |
|
|
Why was a measure of socio-economic deprivation included in the QRisk equation? |
n Cardiovascular risk is closely associated with socio-economic status such that people from deprived areas have higher risks.
n Framingham equations do not include socio-economic status and underestimate risk in people who are relatively socially deprived.
n The use of equations that do not include a measure of socio-economic status may exacerbate inequalities in CVD ie the difference between rich and poor. |
|
|
What is the Townsend score, what does it measure and why was it used? |
n The Townsend Score is a measure of material deprivation based on where a person lives and obtained using their postcode and includes four variables obtained from census data: unemployment (lack of material resources and insecurity), overcrowding (material living conditions), lack of owner occupied accommodation (a proxy indicator of wealth) and lack of car ownership (a proxy indicator of income).
n This score is considered the best indicator of material deprivation currently available and has been widely used in medical research including a range of studies conducted on the QResearch database. |
|
|
How has the QRisk score been validated? |
n The QRisk score was initially validated in a one third sample of the QResearch database by comparing its performance against the traditional Framingham score which is currently in use in the UK. This research was published in the British Medical Journal in July 2007.
n A second validation study was performed using the THIN database (which is a similar UK research database consisting of the electronic records of patients using a different computer system). This was published in the Heart journal in January 2008.
n An editorial accompanying this study explains that the two main measures by which a risk prediction tool should be judged are calibration and discrimination. Calibration relates to how close the predicted risk is to the observed risk. Discrimination is the ability of the tool to differentiate between people who will have an event and those who will not, over a defined period of time (often five to ten years).
n On both measures and in both studies, the QRisk no hyperlink here score outperformed Framingham indicating that it is likely to be more accurate than Framingham at estimating cardiovascular risk. |
|
|
Where patients are on antihypertensive treatment, should a pre-treatment blood pressure be used when calculating their risk? |
n No. QRisk has been designed such that if a patient is taking antihypertensive medication then their current blood pressure on treatment can be used rather than a pre-treatment value. |
|
|
What is the difference between an ‘estimated’ QRisk CVD score and an ‘actual’ QRisk CVD score? |
n In EMIS the actual QRisk CVD score can be calculated where all values needed to calculate the score are available in the patient’s electronic health record.
n In EMIS the estimated QRisk score is a CVD score which has been calculated using the data recorded in the patient’s electronic health record but also using reference values based on the patient’s age and sex where some data are missing.
n For example, if a patient is a 55 year old male and has all the data for calculating a QRisk score in his ‘e’ health record except a systolic blood pressure, then the system will select a default value from a reference table for males aged 55 years.
n An actual QRisk score is one which has been calculated using the patient’s actual recorded data with all the risk factor values available within a clinical consultation with the patient present. It doesn’t have to be done within a consultation. An automatically calculated score with all the risk factor information would still be the ‘actual’ QRisk score. It will not be based on estimated default values. |
|
|
I am a clinician and have a patient with a QRisk score of just under 20% - what should I do? |
n If the risk estimate is marginally below the threshold, clinical judgement should be used to determine whether further treatment of risk factors should be offered (for example, South Asian males).
|
|
|
Why is it important to measure HDL cholesterol in order to get the best estimate of CVD risk?
|
n It is the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol that is the best predictor of risk, better than either total cholesterol or HDL cholesterol alone.
n Someone with a total cholesterol of 7.5mmols/l and an HDL cholesterol of 1.8mmols/l has a ratio of 4.2 which is associated with a considerably lower risk than someone with a total cholesterol of 5.8mmols/l and an HDL of 0.8 (ratio 7.2) |
|
|
What about other factors which may increase CVD risk but are either not included in the 'score' or fully accounted for?
|
n There are other factors which can increase CVD risk which are not directly accounted for in the QRisk algorithm.
n These include, for example, alcohol excess, very heavy smoking, poor diet, lack of exercise and extreme obesity. These factors will all tend to increase risk of cardiovascular disease.
n There is a strong relationship between deprivation and CVD risk, and so the inclusion of deprivation in the QRisk algorithm will take account of this to some extent. |
|
|
Has NICE now recommended QRisk? |
n QRisk has been provisionally recommended by NICE and this recommendation is currently the subject of a second consultation which closes in the first week of March 2008. NICE considered the emerging evidence which suggested that QRisk gives a better estimation of risk in the general population of England and Wales than the Framingham score.
n The Nice Guideline Development Group reviewed this evidence in detail and has revised its recommendations on cardiovascular risk assessment in its review document. NICE also commissioned expert reviews of QRisk and these are given on the NICE website. |
|
|
When will QRisk be available for use in clinical practice nationally? |
n We are waiting for NICE to finalise its guidance before releasing QRisk. |
|
|
Will the QRisk CVD algorithm be updated and change over time? |
n QRisk is a dynamic risk factor score developed from live anonymised electronic health records recorded by thousands of family doctors in the UK. We know that the characteristics of the population change over time and this will affect the equation itself. For example, the incidence of heart disease itself has fallen over the last 30 years, blood pressure has fallen, obesity is rising, smoking patterns have changed.
n QRisk will therefore be updated periodically in order to reflect these population changes and also to take advantage of the continual improvements in the quality of electronic health records and the latest evidence regarding new or additional risk factors. |
|
|
When will QRisk next be updated? |
n We expect that the next release of QRisk will be available in 2009 or 2010. |
|
|
I am a GP and use EMIS clinical computer system. Will QRisk be available in the clinical system? |
n EMIS are developing software which will enable all practices to generate a list of high risk patients for primary prevention in ‘population manager’ based on the new QRisk equation.
n This software will flag patients according to what assessments and interventions are needed so that the appropriate patients can be recalled. |
|
|
I am a GP who uses other clinical computer systems apart from EMIS - will QRisk be available within my clinical system? |
n QRisk will be available under license to the system suppliers for all clinical computer systems in England and Wales.
n It will be up to the system supplier to decide on whether to implement QRisk within the clinical system or not. |
|
|
I am the CHD lead for a PCT and would like to use QRisk in all the practices in my PCT as we have a Locally Enhanced Service.
How can I achieve this?
What data is available to the practices themselves and to me as a PCT.
What training is available? |
n Practices using EMIS will have QRisk incorporated into the clinical system so that they can generate a CVD recall list and establish a CVD primary prevention register. Other computer suppliers may also provide this for their practices.
n In addition, there are third party software companies which have CVD prevention software. A list of approved suppliers which hold a QRisk license will be available.
n EMIS\QResearch may in future provide a PCT level extraction service for EMIS practices subject to governance arrangements, practice consent and costs being met.
n EMIS field staff will be providing training for EMIS practices.
n We expect PCTs and health communities to provide training locally. No other training is being provided by QResearch or EMIS. |
|
|
Will QRisk be available free for research and non commercial use? |
n Yes – the QRisk algorithms will be available free of charge for research and non-commercial personal use under a creative commons license.
n There will be an annual license fee for commercial use. |
|
|
I am interested in using the QRisk CVD algorithm within my own software, where can I find out more information? |
n We have developed a QRisk software development kit designed to be used by commercial companies who wish to embed QRisk in their applications.
n For further details contact Julia.hippisley-cox@nottinghan.ac.uk |
|
|
I am an academic who is currently developing some software with a commercial company which we plan to sell to third parties. I am being paid for my expertise. Can I have a free academic license? |
n No. The arrangements are the same as for a commercial supplier as it is the intended use which is important. |
|
|
What is the definition of commercial use? |
n Use for research purposes means use within a specific research project where the output is a research paper intended for publication in a peer reviewed journal.
n Research expressly excludes service delivery and Commercial Use and the benefits derived from such use must not constitute a financial gain. “Commercial Use” means any purposes which seek to exploit the data for financial gain or any purpose which is likely to place the use of the data in competition with a third party who is seeking to exploit the licensed data. “Financial Gain” means a benefit accruing where the licensee or any third party used by, or connected to, the licensee receives any revenue or financial credit when using the data.
n To avoid any doubt, commercial use (or any other use which falls outside the definition of research) will require further direct discussion and a further licence to be obtained.
|
|
|
As clinical director of a primary care clinical computer system, I have been following the discussions around QRisk. I am keen to review how this scoring system could be integrated within our clinical system. Can you tell me what arrangements are in place for suppliers to have access to the scoring algorithm and supporting data? |
We are currently preparing the technical and user documentation which will describe the input variables/search definition and also how to generate the score with the coefficients. In addition, we are also preparing a mini software development kit which has a set of DLL class libraries which will be licensed and will:
n 'Fill in' missing values for blood pressure, BMI, cholesterol ratio using age-sex reference data where these values are missing.
n Generate an 'actual' QRisk score given the right input parameters for patients with complete data or an 'estimated' QRisk score where one or more data items are missing.
n The software can then be used in single use mode or batch mode (eg to run against the practice database to generate a recall list).
The package will be available under annual license fee and downloadable. In addition to the above, it is likely to include a choice of the following components:
n The read code and search definition needed to extract the patient level data which needs to be fed into the algorithm.
n A postcode to deprivation mapping table to generate the deprivation score.
n The age-sex reference data for the blood pressure, cholesterol, body mass index.
n Test harness/test set of data.
n A web service definition.
n PCT level CVD calculator to derive estimates of the numbers of patients in a PCT at high risk of CVD, the number likely to need risk factor recording and risk factor modification interventions.
The idea behind this approach is to ensure
n The QRisk score is implemented as simply and correctly by suppliers as possible as it is fiddly to calculate.
n Also, it is likely that we will need to update the score every couple of years (as per NICE recommendation) so will want to be able to issue updates simply and reliably. |
|
|
I have further questions on QRisk which haven’t been answered here – who can I contact? |
Please go to http://www.qresearch.org and submit your question online. |